Is Poland next?

A deformed perception of reality

President Putin’s troops are making slow progress in Ukraine but the lack of speed in no way detracts from what military minds see as a foregone conclusion: the physical destruction of a European nation.

In 2017, with a headline-dominating North Korea looking like the biggest threat to global stability, Ben Hodges, then Commanding General of US troops in Europe, told Karina’s Column: “Of course Russia, and its behaviour over the last three years [with invasions of Crimea and Ukraine] is the only nation that really possesses the ability, the capability, to destroy a European country or the United States with their nuclear weapons.”

“So in terms of an existential threat, that’s Russia,” he said, quickly adding a reassuring sentence: “Now it’s not likely, but that’s a part of it.”

Ukrainian bravery cannot stop, only delay, a war criminal with a superior arsenal and armed forces. Negotiations, unless Putin has changed his form, are but a cover for regrouping and keeping his opponents off balance.

We can only speculate at what the ultimate aim of the former KGB spy might be, but a devastated nation, living in fear of the Russian bear next door, is likely to be a satisfactory outcome. There is no need for an occupation, which would drain funds from state coffers. NATO becomes a de jure impossibility for Ukraine – as opposed to a de facto one, which had long been the case. The EU will not, and cannot take on, a country reduced to rubble with a desperate need for a Marshall Plan equivalent.

One of the outcomes of the war is that Russia, despite acquiring pariah status, has slotted back into the top echelon of nations. No more is China the only story.

As the West desperately tries to understand Putin’s motivations and where these will lead, one man who dealt with him as first a President and supporter, to then discover an implacable enemy, says the leaders in the West have never understood and will never understand that Putin has the “mentality of an exponent of organised crime,” Mafia boss rather than statesman.

Mikhail Khodorkovsky, the former owner of petrol company Yukos, worked in parallel with the Russian President until his forays into political opposition landed him in jail for a decade.

In a recent interview with Italian newspaper Corriere, the London-based exile dismissed Putin apologists’ theory that his fear of Ukraine joining NATO led to the invasion.

“He hates NATO but does not fear it. Rather, he is now taken with a messianic mission. He is possessed, and you can see that in his having placed a [17.5m high] statue of Vladimir the Great [Prince of Novgorod, Grand Prince of Kiev, and ruler of Kievan Rus' from 980 to 1015] in front of the Kremlin.”

Khodorkovsky has no doubt the aggression against Ukraine is the fruit of a “deformed” perception of reality. After over two decades in power, the Russian President is surrounded by advisers who through fear dare not tell him the truth.

Putin has already threatened the use of nuclear weapons against the West, turned Belarus into a vassal state, and sent troops to Kazakhstan to quell anti-government unrest in January – it is unclear whether they have all returned home. The Russian Ministry of Defence says they have. At the very least, President Kassym-Jomart Tokayev is entirely in his debt.

The West, anxious about a Third World War, has been very clear that unless a NATO nation is attacked, they will not fight. Only two weeks ago, Russia bombed a military facility in Ukraine close enough to Poland for those on the border to see the flashes.

What would NATO do if Putin bombed some of the exported arms from NATO countries building up on the Polish side of the border? That is one of the few ways into Ukraine and into the hands of its army. Would the West prevaricate, arguing that the attack was about the weapons, not the country? That would be a mistake.

Khodorkovsky is not alone in believing that the West’s military inaction is encouraging Putin. He envisages a scenario where the Russian President will conquer Ukraine - guerrilla warfare will continue - and as the Russian economy worsens, he will launch a war against Poland, a similar distraction to the wars he launched in 2008 and 2014, but more in line with his Vladimir the Great-like ambitions.

At least one Polish mother has already contacted her London-based sister for assistance in extracting her conscription-aged son from the country as quickly as possible.

Putin’s heart-breaking and unprovoked war on Ukraine has had the welcome effect of uniting the West – Sweden is likely to announce it will join NATO by the spring. But the effects on his own country - turning Russians into pariahs, devastating the domestic economy on the back of sanctions and a brain drain, eliminating the last vestiges of a free society – sets the scene for more wars.

Meanwhile, the prognosis for the West’s economy, already suffering from inflationary forces, is dire. Wheat prices at record highs are bound to stay there. There will be no new planting in Ukraine. Oil prices are 70% higher than twelve months ago. with Western leaders like Boris Johnson going cap in hand to unseemly leaders of oil producing states to beg for increased production or deals. Saudi Arabia’s Prince Mohammed bin Salman reportedly refuses to take President Joe Biden’s calls, with the latter having been critical of MBS’s human rights record. Autocracies have been strengthened by Russia’s actions.

The erosion of social cohesion and livelihood crises were two of the top five 10-year risks in the 2022 World Economic Forum Global Risk report. The effects of the invasion can but exacerbate these. Governments will need to tread carefully, and apply support, as a toxic cost of living increase feeds into society.

What might happen if Putin does take the war into Poland? We don’t know. But we do know what a previous invasion of Poland I 1939 led to.

Quantum Matters: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly of Quantum Cybersecurity

With a US inteligence report confirming that President Putin authorised a pro-Trump influence campaign in the latest election, China and the US in a stand-off, and the recklessness of ransomware groups tolerated, and at times abetted, by state actors, geographical risk is at its highest in a long time. See my latest column in The Quantum Daily on how we are skirting the edge. And what steps can be taken to mitigate risk.

An assassination in Sarajevo. The subsequent chain of events ultimately leads to a world war. An estimated 20 million people die.

A small US bank succumbs to a cyberattack. Amidst carefully placed misinformation campaigns, bank runs and riots, the repercussions start to drag down the financial system. The US blames Russia, calls on NATO under Article 5, where an attack on one is an attack on all, and step-by-step the world explodes into the Third World War.

What unifies these two scenarios is that we are living in an era reminiscent of pre-World War I: the seeds of conflict are sown, irrigated by mistrust, and one spark can start a wildfire.

Last month at their Geneva summit Joe Biden made clear to Vladimir Putin where the US red lines in cybersecurity lie. “Certain critical infrastructure should be off-limits to attack, period,” said the US President.  One of the 16 sectors mentioned was financial services. It is a given that the message was also aimed at China, Iran and other hostile states with a track record of cyberattacks.

The US government has been in contact with American banks this year to chivy them into increasing their cyber defences, while Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell stated that cyberattacks are the biggest risk to the system. They can trigger a liquidity run and lead to solvency issues.

One of the most worrying possibilities is a supply chain attack. In a little-publicised paper published by the New York Federal Reserve, Cyber Risk and the US Financial System: A Pre-Mortem Analysis, the authors note that an attack on a significant service provider which connects small and medium sized banks has the potential to cause a systemic event. The concentration of banks using the few existing cloud providers, like AWS or Microsoft’s Azure, for instance, is a clear risk.

The authors also note that in a five-day cyber attack, nearly half of US financial institutions would run out of reserves by day five.

The top concern is not so much a provocation, as a misjudgement, ultimately leading to WWIII. Take the recent Colonial Pipeline attack by DarkSide. They planned to attack the business side, not the operational side, which is responsible for transmitting roughly 45% of East Coast fuel. They knew the latter would be perceived as an attack on infrastructure, bringing the might of the US intelligence services down on them for straying into the political arena.

“We are apolitical, we do not participate in geopolitics, do not need to tie us with a defined government and look for our other motives,” they swiftly posted on their Dark Web page, as they sought to excuse their error and distance themselves from suspicions of links to the Russian government.

There is no easy solution to the uncertainty of who is behind a cyber attack, nor to mishaps prevalent in a digital world.

But there is a clear need for key sectors to take a big step up in cybersecurity. Not least with China – which just celebrated the 100th anniversary of the Communist Party amid Taiwan fly-overs – on what looks ever more likely to be a collision course with the West.

Paradoxically, the quantum industry may be the answer to cybersecurity, while also being its biggest threat. The creation of quantum keys which are certifiably random – unlike the current RSA encryption and other standard ones – could provide hacker-free security. At least eleven global banks are exploring quantum safe protocols for security, ranging from JP Morgan to BNP Paribas and RBC of Canada, as reported here by The Quantum Daily (TQD). Around thirty-five quantum companies in countries ranging from Poland to Singapore are working on quantum cybersecurity products.

A handful of years down the line powerful quantum computers may be able to decrypt the data already being harvested by ransomware gangs and hostile nation states – yet another reason to experiment with current quantum cryptography.

Although information is hard to come by, China reportedly has quantum key distribution technology over fibre optic cable between Beijing and Shanghai. In essence, a quantum internet, providing hundreds of kilometres of totally secure communications.

The West is intent on catching up, with governments and companies spending large sums. Germany, for instance, announced in May a €2bn investment in quantum and related technologies, while a month later British start-up Arquit announced a link with defence company Northrop Grumman to explore its own end-to-end quantum encryption.  Meanwhile, the US Department of Energy last year unveiled a blueprint for a quantum internet.

The Cold War arms race mostly involved creating weapons of destruction, the so-called Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD) doctrine which, arguably, kept the peace over many decades. In the 21st century, the most important advance in keeping world peace will be security and protection: Mutually Assured Defence – not as MAD.